<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>This is who I am &#187; health care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.docsmooth.com/tag/health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.docsmooth.com</link>
	<description>Robert aka docsmooth - a bit about me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polititions saying what&#8217;s best for re-election&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.docsmooth.com/2009/09/polititions-saying-whats-best-for-re-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.docsmooth.com/2009/09/polititions-saying-whats-best-for-re-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>docsmooth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[randomness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docsmooth.com/2009/09/polititions-saying-whats-best-for-re-election/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin wrote on a Facebook note today: &#8220;We know from long experience that the creation of a massive new bureaucracy will not provide us with “more stability and security,” but just the opposite.&#8221; But didn&#8217;t the Patriot Act create a massive new bureaucracy to provide us with more security and stability? And doesn&#8217;t the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin wrote on a Facebook note today: &#8220;We know from long experience that the creation of a massive new bureaucracy will not provide us with “more stability and security,” but just the opposite.&#8221;</p>
<p>But didn&#8217;t the Patriot Act create a massive new bureaucracy to provide us with more security and stability?  And doesn&#8217;t the Republican Party line support the Patriot Act?</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m confused here: the big problem with the current Health Care reform bill is it will create a new bureaucracy, and bureaucracy by definition can&#8217;t secure us, BUT we need to keep the bureaucracy of the Department of Homeland Security bcause it&#8217;s the only way to secure us?</p>
<p>Dear politicians and talking heads: let&#8217;s all get on the same page:<br />
1) come to concensus on the project *goals*<br />
2) debate the project *plan*.</p>
<p>For me?  I&#8217;d like to know that I will have health insurance after I am hit with an errant stick while playing hockey, and not have to worry about it being denied for some legal mumbo-jumbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.docsmooth.com/2009/09/polititions-saying-whats-best-for-re-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
